Having been to professional tastings in my varied career in the wine business, I was somewhat apprehensive about going to Hahn’s offices for their Taste Live on Saturday, November 6. Professional tastings (or even the big public tastings such as Pinot Days or ZAP) can be somber events with admittedly great wines tasted and the pressure to take intelligent notes stressful. (I’d much rather drink than write about what I’m drinking.)
But because I not only like Hahn’s wines a lot, but like the folks at Hahn (one of the few wineries completely devoid of attitude, just a lot of very friendly people), I decided to go with my partner Michael French. I brought my computer with me, since my cell phone does not allow people with fat fingers to type accurately on its mini-version of a mini-keyboard.
I figured I would taste a wine, write a note, taste another wine, write another note. Dull, but necessary to keep up appearances as a professional wine writer. (Truth in blogging: Fuck that shit, I don’t fool anyone.)
Now I had read on the invite that there would be “nibbles” to accompany the wines. Nibbles! I don’t nibble. I eat. So I decided I would first head off to one of my favorite spots in the city of Napa, Downtown Joe’s, a brewpub with good food and great beer (I know, but I go both ways).
Having filled up on chicken enchiladas and a delicious Porter, I headed off to the Hahn offices. Uh-oh. Nibbles? There was a spread not only fit for a king, but fit even for me. Oh, well. There’s always room for more.
First things first. I started up my computer. It crashed. Rebooted. Crashed again. Odd, because I had used my computer at Downtown Joe’s to check email, map out how to get to Hahn’s offices, and basically look like an Important Person. This was frustrating, because the first wine, the Cycles Gladiator Chardonnay, had already been poured. Have you ever tried to balance a stubborn laptop, a cell phone (as backup), a glass of wine and a plate of smoked trout brandade?
Smoked trout brandade? This gives you an idea of the “nibbles” that Philip Woodrow prepared. This was an extraordinary combination of flavors and textures. Mmm. Apparently that was just what my computer needed, because right after I inhaled that incredible dish, my computer booted up and I could proceed to attend to the business at hand, which was to eat more of that delicious smoked trout brandade.
But to the wine. Cycles Gladiator Chardonnay. One quick taste told me Central Coast fruit. (So did the label, but I like to think I figured it out from the taste.) It was tropical fruit: papaya, pineapple, a bit apple-y, light oak, some floral aromas. Not especially complex, but a typical Chardonnay of that style, except this one was very well made. Normally I’m not a fan of California Chardonnay (I love White Burgundy, especially Meursault). And while this wine would not get me to drink California Chardonnay regularly, it is definitely one to buy, especially for my friends who love Chardonnay.
The next wine, a 2006 Monterey Pinot Noir under the Hahn Label, happens to be my everyday house Pinot. I bought this wine even before I joined the Hahn wine club where I can now buy it at a price so low it gives their accountants heart attacks.
This wine is smooth, with delicious cherry flavors and Asian spice aromas. It is rich yet not syrupy. There is an elegance to this wine that belies its velvety texture. It was paired with shrimp wrapped in bacon. Many people at the tasting loved the pairing. I did not, though I loved the shrimp and adored the wine. To me, the fruit in the wine was partially obscured by the smokiness of the dish. Other people though it enhanced it. Shows what I know. Or what they know. Actually I found the Pinot went better with the cheeses, including the Humboldt Fog.
But so far, 2 out of 2 for the wine and 2 out of 2 for the food. (Did I say the food was incredible? I did? Ok, I’ll probably say it again later too.)
The third wine was Smith & Hook Cabernet Sauvignon. I don’t recall the year (note: I wasn’t really tasting the wines. Wines this good you don’t taste. You drink. And I drank.) The cabernet was paired with tri-tip in a cabernet reduction sauce. There was nothing reduced about the flavor of that sauce. This was the best dish of the evening. And it had real competition too! This Cabernet showed the classic flavors of cassis and plum with a hint of chocolate and vanilla, accompanied by fine tannins and a lingering finish. This wine and food were so well paired that I saw them leaving the party together.
Wine #4: Petite Sirah. This was under their Huntington label. I enjoy Petite Sirah a lot. To me, this is a wine you drink for the sheer sensual pleasure of it. There were flavors of deep dark plum and blackberry fruit, a bit of burnt brown sugar, chocolate–not cocoa, but dark chocolate flavors. This is one of the few wines I actually can enjoy completely without food. (Some Zinfandels are like that too, though mostly I prefer wine with food.)
The wine was paired with ‘smores, though I didn’t have any. I try to limit my sugar intake to those sugars that have been digested by yeast. Of course, having had a cupcake from the cupcakery next to the Napa Valley Opera House earlier didn’t help. But the Petite Sirah was delicious and I didn’t miss the ‘smores.
A bonus round of Hahn Syrah was next poured. But I have no notes on it. I did taste it, remember liking it, though I have a bottle here at home and will taste it again this week.
Also on the food table were vegetables, though I didn’t have any. They were green. And while I remember reading somewhere that vegetables are good for you, I also remember reading not to believe everything you read. But they did look good.
It was interesting to note that at the start of the Taste Live, everyone was busy on their cell phones and computers, tweeting away, happily paying attention only to themselves and their keystroking. But that didn’t last long. Soon people were doing as people ought to be doing. Talking, being friendly, enjoying the wine and food. And forgetting to Tweet.
There are some remarkable people in the wine business. Interesting people. Intelligent people. Friendly people. Talkative people. Are people who work in other industries the same? Would a party of shoe salespeople be as much fun? Who knows? Who am I to pass judgment on how boring people in other fields are? (That was a joke. Get over it.)
This was a terrific event. The food was delicious. The wines were excellent. But it was the people who hosted and the people who attended that made the evening. I’m only sorry that I didn’t get to talk to everyone who was there, but met new people, talked to others I’ve only tweeted with, and had a truly great time. But oh, those wines and that food!